#RAWDIGGER PHOTOGRAPHY LIFE PATCH#

I expected the reproduction profiles to be distinctly more accurate than the other profiles. That is not the case: the Z7 - by a whisker - is the most accurate with the Lumariver profiles, but the least accurate with the others. I expected that the profiles that were the most accurate with the Lumariver reproduction profiles would be the most accurate with the others. Here’s what I got for average CIELab Delta-E 2000 errors: I ran my Matlab CC24 color analyser program on all 18 images (6 from each camera). The X-Rite Color Checker Camera Calibration profile made with the CCSG target (CCCC SG).The X-Rite Color Checker Camera Calibration profile made with the CC24 target (CCCC 24).The Lumariver reproduction profile made with the CC24 target (CC24 Repro).The Lumariver reproduction profile made with the CCSG target (CCSG Repro).

#RAWDIGGER PHOTOGRAPHY LIFE PATCH#

I took images of the CC24 made with both cameras and exported them from Lightroom, after white balancing to the third grey patch from the left, with these profiles: Lumariver Profile Designer, reproduction mode, 2.5 D tables, flat fielded.X-Rite Color Checker Camera Calibration.

I made profiles for all the cameras using both targets and

I used the same setup to capture white card images for flat fielding.

Godox/Flashpoint AD600 Pro strobes, set to 1/64 power.

I made test shots of both the Macbeth Colorchecker 24-patch target (the CC24), and the Colorchecker SG 140-patch target (CCSG).

Rawdigger photography life